Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-11700K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - $128.04 vs $241.05
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 239% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-6300 - 78 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 45% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-6300 - $3.09 vs $5.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
23
29.48717948717949%
Value, $/FPS
$5.57/FPS
55.475763016157984%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348430 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
78
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$241.05
53%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $241.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |