Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-3770 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-3770 is 365 days older than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6350 - 94 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-6350 - $80.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6350 - $0.85 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280461 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |