Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 1624 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Core i7-920 - 155 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 10% cheaper than FX-6350 - $90.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Rust than FX-6350 - $0.59 vs $0.65 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280469 minutes ago
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |