Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $185.0 vs $210.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 79% better in Diablo IV than FX-8350 - 174 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 37% better value when playing Diablo IV than FX-8350 - $1.21 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
97
55.74712643678161%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
63.35078534031414%
Price, $
$185
100%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353905 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
88%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |