Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3450 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8350 - 188 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than FX-8350 - $169.21 vs $185.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8350 - $0.9 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
168
89.36170212765957%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
81.81818181818181%
Price, $
$185
91%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353872 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $169.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353872 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |