Buy on Amazon
$276.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $303
Availability
MSRP in USD: $303
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 457 days older than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $276.99 vs $498.95
- Up to 40% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-4765T - $2.54 vs $4.26 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8370 - 117 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
109
93.16239316239316%
Value, $/FPS
$2.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$276.99
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD8370FRHKBOX FX-8370 Black Edition 8 Core CPU Processor AM3+ 4300Mhz 125W 16MB
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360447 minutes ago
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.26/FPS
59.62441314553991%
Price, $
$498.95
55%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7 i7-4765T Quad-core (4 Core) 2 GHz Processor - Socket H3 LGA-1150OEM Pack - 1 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 3 GHz Overclocking Speed - 22 nm - 3 Number of Monitors Supported - Intel HD 4600 Gr
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
