Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2067 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8370 - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than FX-8370 - $244.77 vs $276.99
- Up to 18% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8370 - $1.36 vs $1.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 20 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
168
93.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
82.42424242424244%
Price, $
$276.99
88%
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353872 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353872 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |