Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 1 days older than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $276.99 vs $549.95
- Up to 48% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-5930K - $1.46 vs $2.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than FX-8370 - 197 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 12 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
190
96.44670050761421%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$276.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360812 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.79/FPS
52.329749103942646%
Price, $
$549.95
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360814 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |