Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 2681 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $276.99 vs $458.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-12900 - $0.62 vs $0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 55% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8370 - 697 vs 449 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
449
64.41893830703013%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$276.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359684 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
697
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
93.93939393939394%
Price, $
$458
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |