Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2947 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $276.99 vs $531.86
- Up to 10% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-13900KF - $0.62 vs $0.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 71% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8370 - 766 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
449
58.61618798955613%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$276.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360455 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
766
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
89.85507246376812%
Price, $
$531.86
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360455 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |