Buy on Amazon
$276.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 1694 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $276.99 vs $372.84
- Up to 10% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-9900 - $2.54 vs $2.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8370 - 132 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
109
82.57575757575758%
Value, $/FPS
$2.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$276.99
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD8370FRHKBOX FX-8370 Black Edition 8 Core CPU Processor AM3+ 4300Mhz 125W 16MB
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359673 minutes ago
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
90.07092198581562%
Price, $
$372.84
74%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-9900 Coffee Lake Processor 3.1GHz 8.0GT/s 16MB LGA 1151 CPU, Retail
Buy for $372.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359674 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
