Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2835 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $189.0 vs $198.9
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than FX-9370 - 188 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Stray than FX-9370 - $1.06 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
177
94.14893617021278%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
99.06542056074767%
Price, $
$189
100%
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358160 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.9
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |