Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2590 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $298.02 vs $1045.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $1.53 vs $5.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 220 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 6% better in The Outer Worlds than FX-9590 - 207 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
195
94.20289855072464%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350473 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.05/FPS
30.297029702970296%
Price, $
$1045
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,045 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350474 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |