Buy on Amazon
$298.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1521 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $298.02 vs $788.88
- Up to 61% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.33 vs $3.4 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-9590 - 232 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 180 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
224
96.55172413793103%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350591 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.4/FPS
39.117647058823536%
Price, $
$788.88
37%
FPS Winner
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350593 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
