Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3129 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 204 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than FX-9590 - $153.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - $0.75 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
169
82.84313725490196%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
42.61363636363637%
Price, $
$298.02
51%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348674 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$153
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $153 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348675 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |