Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1302 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 24% better in War Thunder than FX-9590 - 166 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than FX-9590 - $110.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 70% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-9590 - $0.66 vs $2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
134
80.72289156626506%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
29.729729729729726%
Price, $
$298.02
36%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348850 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |