Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1476 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $298.02 vs $375.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-7820X - $0.66 vs $0.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 23% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9590 - 559 vs 454 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 140 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
454
81.21645796064401%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350292 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
559
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
98.50746268656717%
Price, $
$375
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |