Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2142 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $298.02 vs $389.88
- Up to 14% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-9700F - $2.5 vs $2.91 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-9590 - 134 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
119
88.80597014925374%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350301 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.91/FPS
85.91065292096219%
Price, $
$389.88
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |