Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2321 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $298.02 vs $615.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900X - $0.66 vs $1.06 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9590 - 580 vs 454 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 165 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
454
78.27586206896552%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350537 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
580
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
62.264150943396224%
Price, $
$615
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |