Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1552 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $298.02 vs $299.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 22% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9590 - 553 vs 454 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9590 - $0.54 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 140 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
454
82.09764918625679%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
81.81818181818183%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350408 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
553
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |