Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1543 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $298.02 vs $425.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-7940X - $2.66 vs $3.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than FX-9590 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 165 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 28 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
112
92.56198347107438%
Value, $/FPS
$2.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350291 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
75.7834757834758%
Price, $
$425
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |