Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4873 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 21% better in God of War than Phenom II X4 830 - 195 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 32 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
