Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 249 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $130.0 vs $160.91
- Up to 14% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9400 - $1.3 vs $1.52 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 106 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
100
94.33962264150944%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353985 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
106
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
85.52631578947368%
Price, $
$160.91
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353984 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
72.03757225433526%
Multi-Core
2858
59.603753910323256%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |