Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 165 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen 3 2200G - 99 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $109.99 vs $130.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen 3 2200G - $1.11 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280367 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280367 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |