Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 3440 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-920 - 157 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $90.0 vs $155.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.63 vs $0.99 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
63.63636363636363%
Price, $
$155
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359778 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
143
91.0828025477707%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359777 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
36.02430555555556%
Multi-Core
1434
29.621978929973146%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |