Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 is 1436 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-8350 - $90.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8350 - $0.33 vs $0.68 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-920 - 274 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
273
99.63503649635037%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349881 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
48.529411764705884%
Price, $
$185
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |