Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3101 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than Core i5-2500K - 61 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $110.99 vs $390.81
- Up to 78% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-2500K - $1.82 vs $8.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349691 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
47
77.04918032786885%
Value, $/FPS
$8.32/FPS
21.875%
Price, $
$390.81
28%
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
40.45084533500313%
Multi-Core
1921
27.905287623474724%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |