Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 261 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Core i9-9920X - 61 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $110.99 vs $595.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9920X - $1.82 vs $10.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349454 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
58
95.08196721311475%
Value, $/FPS
$10.26/FPS
17.738791423001953%
Price, $
$595
18%
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |