Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3219 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 202 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than FX-9590 - $169.21 vs $298.02
- Up to 52% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - $0.84 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $169.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
169
83.66336633663366%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
47.72727272727273%
Price, $
$298.02
56%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348670 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |