Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 1198 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9400F - 143 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $112.0 vs $294.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $0.85 vs $2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 65 vs 105 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.06/FPS
41.262135922330096%
Price, $
$294
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $294 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351283 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
131
91.6083916083916%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351284 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
65.90148254423721%
Multi-Core
4834
44.121942314713394%
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 20th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |