Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $112.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900F - $0.6 vs $1.27 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9400F - 193 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
187
96.89119170984456%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348505 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
47.24409448818898%
Price, $
$244.77
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348504 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
82.21957040572792%
Multi-Core
4834
57.37004509850463%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |