Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 9 3900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 9 3900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 9 3900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $445.0 vs $567.98
- Up to 9% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900 - $3.97 vs $4.34 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 3900X - 131 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
112
85.49618320610686%
Value, $/FPS
$3.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$445
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $445 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354056 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.34/FPS
91.4746543778802%
Price, $
$567.98
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354055 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1693
62.38025055268975%
Multi-Core
9938
60.50164373554121%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |