Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1554 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 18% better in Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 208 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $2.73 vs $3.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $530.0 vs $567.98
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$567.98
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280165 minutes ago
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |