Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 719 days newer than Ryzen 9 6900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 6900HS - 137 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS - 32 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 6900HS
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rembrandt | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
6 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
