Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1358 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 62% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-9400F - 582 vs 360 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $112.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.31 vs $1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
582
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
20%
Price, $
$899.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350486 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
360
61.855670103092784%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350487 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
46.902654867256636%
Multi-Core
4834
25.055719691079663%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |