Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 994 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $270.0 vs $299.98
- Up to 8% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-10900 - $1.48 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 186 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
182
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280565 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
91%
Price, $
$299.98
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280564 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |