Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 994 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $270.0 vs $283.35
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 115 vs 95 FPS
- Up to 13% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $2.22 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
95
82.6086956521739%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
86.71875000000001%
Price, $
$270
100%
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354070 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$283.35
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354069 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
66.5910380034033%
Multi-Core
6976
76.20712256936858%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |