Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1402 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $98.02 vs $1199.99
- Up to 90% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 5 5600X - $0.49 vs $5.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 20% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3930 - 238 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
83.61344537815127%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350065 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
238
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.04/FPS
9.722222222222223%
Price, $
$1199.99
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350066 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
29.063097514340345%
Multi-Core
1043
12.045270816491511%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |