Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 1019 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $98.02 vs $1200.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10980XE - $0.65 vs $7.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3930 - 160 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 36 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
151
94.375%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350065 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.5/FPS
8.666666666666668%
Price, $
$1200
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350066 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
38.726114649681534%
Multi-Core
1043
8.702544847726324%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-10980XE |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 18 |
2 | Threads | 36 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |