Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3210 - 294 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $70.0 vs $99.03
- Up to 24% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-10100 - $0.26 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 55 vs 95 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
294
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
76.47058823529412%
Price, $
$99.03
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
274
93.19727891156462%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
35.694249649368864%
Multi-Core
1018
24.151838671411625%
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |