Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1668 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-3210 - 231 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $65.23 vs $70.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-3210 - $0.28 vs $0.31 per FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
223
96.53679653679653%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
90.3225806451613%
Price, $
$70
93%
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354102 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
46.39927073837739%
Multi-Core
1018
32.245802977510294%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |