Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1194 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-9400 - 131 vs 121 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $94.98 vs $160.91
- Up to 45% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-9400 - $0.73 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348741 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
121
92.36641221374046%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
54.887218045112775%
Price, $
$160.91
59%
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1384
62.20224719101124%
Multi-Core
4795
64.30199812256939%
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |