Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2065 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6900K - 131 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $94.98 vs $145.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6900K - $0.73 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 58 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348668 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
120
91.6030534351145%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
60.33057851239669%
Price, $
$145
65%
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
56.26966292134832%
Multi-Core
7118
95.45393589915516%
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |