Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 14% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-8120 - 124 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $78.02 vs $147.99
- Up to 39% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-13100 - $0.72 vs $1.19 per FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
60.50420168067227%
Price, $
$147.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348670 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
109
87.90322580645162%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348670 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |