Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 57% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3220 - 223 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $79.0 vs $147.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-13100 - $0.56 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 55 vs 60 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
223
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
84.84848484848484%
Price, $
$147.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348678 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
142
63.67713004484305%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348677 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
23.302263648468706%
Multi-Core
1085
14.788060515196946%
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |