Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2879 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $49.0 vs $112.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-9400F - $0.24 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-2100 - 238 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
207
86.97478991596638%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349225 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
238
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
51.06382978723404%
Price, $
$112
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
33.81712626995646%
Multi-Core
954
19.73520893669839%
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |