Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1654 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $49.0 vs $99.9
- Up to 44% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-6700T - $0.24 vs $0.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-2100 - 231 vs 207 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
207
89.6103896103896%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349228 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
55.81395348837209%
Price, $
$99.9
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
39.391377852916314%
Multi-Core
954
26.75266404935502%
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |