Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1927 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $49.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-6900K - $0.37 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 31% better in War Thunder than Core i3-2100 - 171 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 16 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
131
76.60818713450293%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349092 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
43.529411764705884%
Price, $
$145
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
37.22044728434505%
Multi-Core
954
13.402641191345884%
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |