Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $170.0 vs $522.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900K - $1.56 vs $3.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 50% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-2120 - 164 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
109
66.46341463414635%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$170
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361055 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.19/FPS
48.90282131661442%
Price, $
$522.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
501
16.84599865501009%
Multi-Core
1035
5.136986301369863%
Intel Core i3-2120 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |