Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 4336 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $170.0 vs $567.98
- Up to 58% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-13900 - $0.28 vs $0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 43% better in Minecraft than Core i3-2120 - 864 vs 606 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 32 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
606
70.13888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$170
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361146 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
864
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
42.42424242424242%
Price, $
$567.98
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
501
18.459837877671333%
Multi-Core
1035
6.30098624132473%
Intel Core i3-2120 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |